THEORY II - THE UNIVERSE
Before matter came into existence, the current Universe constituted a volume of relatively stationary U.P’s. At some stage in its history, a given volume of U.P’s sustained spin motion which generated relative velocities in the U.P’s causing wide spread impacts between them. The impacts led to the development of protons and subsequently hydrogen. The accumulation of hydrogen under the influence of gravity led to the development of stars and consequently diverse molecular matter. Intense energy fields around stars reignited the process of matter formation. Since the rate of matter formation and photonic mass generation through electromagnetic waves are proportional to the amount of matter in existence, the Universe expands at an accelerating rate. The spin motion of the entire medium causes matter to be continually displaced outwards, thus contributing to the observed accelerating rate of expansion. Under constant Universal Pressure, the spin motion of the Universe results in increasing flatness of its spherical geometry.
| The Reality of Mass |
| Gravity |
| Electromagnetic Waves |
| E = 0.5mv2 |
| E = mc2 |
| Quantum Uncertainty |
| Magnetism |
| THEORY II |
| Matter Distribution |
The above statement, which is based on the U.P hypothesis, describes the initial condition which led to the development of matter in the Universe as being spin motion of a given volume of U.P’s. Based on this concept, protons and neutrons may be assumed to have a spin direction corresponding to that of the spin of the entire volume of the Universe. Consequently, the lifetime of antiprotons must be considerably shorter, not only as a result of annihilation, but also because their spin is in a direction opposite to that of the spin of the entire medium, and hence the greater abundance of matter over antimatter.
Since protons are positively charged, it can therefore be argued that all positively charged particles of matter or anti-matter have much longer lifetime than their counterparts of opposite polarity. For example a positron should have much longer lifetime than an electron. However, due to the high density of electrons as a result of the abundance of protons, positrons do not survive very long before they become annihilated. Generally, the density of particles in a given volume of space has a direct effect on the lifetime of their antiparticles. As such, maintaining antiparticles for the longest possible time can only be accomplished in isolation from matter or alternatively within matter particles of the same polarity, e.g., antiprotons within a medium of electrons and positrons within a medium of protons. However, it is anticipated that particles other than electrons maintained in ionised hydrogen environment decay rapidly as a result of the disturbance which protons induced in the surroundings.
According to the U.P hypothesis, antiparticles are only distinguishable as such within the frame of reference of known particles, i.e., by observing their spin direction or curvilinear motion in relation to the known particles. For example, in a stationary state in isolation, a positron is not distinguishable from an electron by mere observation of its electromagnetic waves. However, atoms of antimatter particles should be detectable through their electromagnetic waves, because their line spectra should be mirror image of their counterpart atoms of matter particles.